patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Hopatcong Mayor Violated Ethics Law, State Says

DCA said Sylvia Petillo broke a state local government ethics law when she used borough money to fund a mailing to residents advocating a referendum.

 

Hopatcong Mayor Sylvia Petillo broke a local government ethics law when she spent $2,316.11 of borough funds on a mailing to borough residents urging them to vote "yes" to a referendum last November, the state Department of Community Affairs said.

Petillo attempted to use her position as mayor "to secure an unwarranted privilege or advantage for herself or others," which violated N.J.S.A. 40A: 9.22.5(C), according to a state Local Finance Board notice of violation.

Click to the right for the notice of violation.

The notice wasn't a final determination, however, the state said. Petillo, whose $100 fine was waived because the violation didn't personally benefit her, the state said, has until July 25 to file for a hearing with the board to contest its ruling.

The second-term mayor said she plans to fight the decision.

"They did not explain what the violation was or how I profited by it," Petillo said when reached by phone Thursday. "They have not explained how it personally benefitted me and that's the issue. There was no personal benefit to me or anyone else."

Petillo also defending the mailing, saying she's sent out others that have helped Hopatcong residents over the years.

"When you're having a referendum, people need to understand why you're having a referendum and how it will benefit them," Petillo said later.

In a letter to borough residents before the Nov. 5 election, Petillo advocated a referendum that would combine Hopatcong's zoning and planning boards into a land-use board.

But, according to the state, Petillo went too far when she twice said in the letter that she recommends residents vote in favor of the referendum. The statements didn't "have an objective factual basis," the state said.

The referendum eventually passed, 1,493-479.

Randall Paulenich of Hopatcong filed a complaint over the mailing with the DCA earlier in 2012, which led to the investigation and ruling, the state said.

Combining the boards was "a benefit to the taxpayer and a benefit to the applicant," said Petillo, who added the move cut down on legal fees and time residents spent shuffling between the boards.

The move also cuts down on confusion between the zoning and planning boards, which often didn't communicate well, Petillo said.

Related Topics: Ethics Law and Sylvia Petillo

Roll Back Our Tax

8:36 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

The problem is "she was running for reelection" when she sent the letter out. It could be considered a personal benefit had I disclosed that to the authorities. Right now it's just a violation of "misuse of taxpayer's money" and we will seek restituition if she wants to fight it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rockon

8:59 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

RBOT If I remember right she was running unopposed except for a late write in and in the letter she asked people to " consider" voting yes. Why don't you publish the letter ?

Comment_arrow

I love Hopatcong

10:31 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

As I recall Randy, the Mayor was running unopposed except for a last minute write-in. She did receive over 85% didn't she? So where was the benefit? The only thing that I see is a wording issue. You are so hell-bent on criticizing Mrs. Petillo that you lose sight of the benefits that a Land Use Board brings to the process. But once again this IS personal for you, isn't it.

Comment_arrow

The Watcher

10:48 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

"Rokon" why don't you ask the mayor for a copy of the letter? I'm sure she would be happy to give it to you.
"I love Hopatcong" you're so "hell-bent" on defending the mayor you can't see that it's not Randy that made the decision it was the STATE that decided it was a violation. Maybe you should address your complaints to the state and stop making it personal. http://hopatcong.patch.com/articles/zoning-board-head-supports-passed-referendum

Comment_arrow

Michele Guttenberger

11:58 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

What is ethically wrong with this is that the voters only got to hear one side of why we should vote "Yes". Where was the ability for the opposition to give rebuttal? Where is the opportunity for the citizen to object? How would their objection reach the same number of people as the mailer that went out. Would they have to use their own personal resources to pay for postage. How were the people in Hopatcong informed on all sides of this issue. There must have been another motive behind it. Because, the cost savings was a very weak argument. Patch was the only public forum that gave the opposition a voice. But how many people read this http://hopatcong.patch.com/articles/letter-vote-no-on-land-use-board-merger Few people have the courage to stand up against the Mayor. Bravo to Randy! This took a lot of time and effort to do this. The average person would have just given up. This is an example of the endurance one has to have to for them to take notice. The Mayor has control over every Board and commission and there is NO mechanism, platform or leverage for the citizen to oppose the Mayor & Council. If they do they are not allowed to be on Boards or Committee which insures they are kept from ever knowing the decisions that are being made. No one is given an objective review and evaluation. So no one can claim it is a benefit just based on the Mayor's opinion. It is dangerous to run a Town on one person's opinion, in fact one can say it is unethical and undemocratic.

Comment_arrow

Rockon

1:50 pm on Friday, July 13, 2012

When and if the mayor is exonerated will RBOT, Watcher and all the other mayor haters submit a public apology to her ?

Comment_arrow

The Watcher

12:30 am on Saturday, July 14, 2012

Rockon once again you are trying to label people and speak for them. I will speak for myself when I say I do not "hate" the mayor, nor do I have anything to apologize for. You (in my opinion) have much to consider concerning your conduct. You are entitled to your opinion, but I don't think opinion "a view or judgment formed about something not necessarily based on fact or knowledge" includes name calling or speaking for others (as you so often do). At this time the mayor IS FOUND IN VIOLATION maybe you should present a defense for the mayor and submit a public apology to those of us who are trying to have a civil exchange of information and ideas. Your argument is with the state they made the decision.

hopatcong84

8:44 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

She wastes so much of the taxpayers money anyway. Whats another 2300. Time for a change!

Reply

jazzman

8:59 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

I would like to review the referendum,but if she did anything it was most likely to benefit her dont ya think!?So as a taxpayer I saw no benefits as of yet from this mailing,so THEN.....who`s left?

Reply

Lake Resident

9:23 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

Couldn't agree with you more hopatcong84, The taxes in this town are at a extreme high with the town crumbling around us between lost business', foreclosures besides it looks in shambles!!!! They should be using the taxpayers monies towards profiting on the LAKE community. Instead she is wasting cash and time sending out mailings. That $2300 could have been placed to better use towards paving roads, sidewalks on our streets or better yet, what about sending our summons to those who neglect their properties which cause Hopatcong becoming the eyesore community it is today - The monies claimed saved the taxpayers nor community will never benefit nor see!

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

9:33 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

The letter from the state I posted above for those who requested it.

Reply

hopatcong84

9:35 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

Taxes high. Water bills high. Have to pay to throw your trash away plus extra to throw a freaking chair away. Sewers, that not the whole town has but the people that do have them are paying out their butts for them. If you didnt
hookup they would fine you. Hopatcong needs new leadership.

Reply

Lurky Loo

10:01 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

Randy! I only have 2 words for you...THANK YOU!
She's been back dooring this town for years and hopefully now everyone will know what she's really about. Wake up kids, it's time to take our town back! Get rid of her cronies in Nov! Vote out Bunce and Ryder-Galante.

Reply

Vox D

10:19 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

No she is a good mayor its a hard job so no one is perfect

Reply

Miss Scarlett

10:24 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

They need to start with the borough attorney. I'm sure they consulted him before sending out this letter I have found they don't make a decision without wasting money to consult him first. Mr. Know it all, they should request the money back they paid him and make her pay back the money she used!
I have a story on deception made by this administration. All seats need to be changed as well as a clean out of the administration building staff.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michele Guttenberger

12:21 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

Miss Scarlett - If you have a valid story on deception, do what Randy did - write a letter to the proper authorities. Do what the Mayor did to get her "Yes" vote. Send out letters. Let's keep our postal workers employed. The Mayor has done her part.

The Watcher

10:26 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

Funny how the mayor, Bunce, and Galate accused the Board of Health of violations. From what I was told the town now budgets an extra $25,000.00 to the combined board, so where was it saving money. The mayor and council just wanted the complete takeover of the town. Time to file with the attorney general's office for the repayment of the money, and to stop the abuse of power politics! Can't wait to hear what her defense is going to be. Will she be using the town attorney at the residents expense?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Interesting

10:40 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

Watcher - Where where were "you told" the combined budgets were $25k more than the original budgets of the two commissions individually. I believe that if you ask the town CFO you will find this to be false.

Comment_arrow

The Watcher

2:35 pm on Tuesday, August 7, 2012

I was told it is listed in the budget

Roll Back Our Tax

10:40 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

I love Hopatcong....I was ready for that comment of being a "personal issue" with me. Tell that to the 450 members that belong to my RBOT group that encouraged me to file the complaint!

Reply
Comment_arrow

I love Hopatcong

11:01 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

Maybe the 1475 voters that actually came out to support the Mayor would disagree with you. You lost Randy. Deal with it. Perhaps your community contributions are misunderstood.

Comment_arrow

The Watcher

11:21 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

Guess your proof the end justifies the means no matter what the cost. I love Hopatcong, Randy is winning according to the state, so maybe you should deal with it. You should go down and testify for the mayor when she contests the decision, I'm sure she would welcome your input.

Tammy

11:38 pm on Thursday, July 12, 2012

I can understand the Mayor wanting to make sure her constituents are aware of the details of an upcoming issue. That being said, why couldn't she have made a recording and auto-dialed all the residents? That would have been quite a savings to an already cash strapped budget.
I love Hopatcong-While you are content with our Mayor and the direction this town is headed in you must realize that many of us are not. Perhaps you are the type who doesn't like to "rock the boat". As taxpayers it is our job to question everything. So what if Randy alerted the state to something he felt wasn't quite right. The mayor is entrusted with A LOT of our money, we have every right to raise a red flag. If the Mayor you are so fond of has nothing to hide it shouldn't matter who questions her actions. You wouldn't willingly hand your checkbook over to your neighbor and trust him to do the right thing and not bother to keep tabs on him would you? Why are you so insulted that a taxpayer questioned if all of our money is being spent ethically and prudently? Would you be so offended by it all if it were somebody other than Randy who contacted the state? Has it occurred to you that he may not have been the only one to do so?

Reply
Comment_arrow

The Watcher

12:01 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

Tammy when a referendum is placed on the ballot there is an explanation sent with the sample ballot. There is no need to send a personal letter from the mayor that may influence the voters.

Comment_arrow

Tammy

8:37 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

Good Morning Watcher-I know an explanation is sent with the sample ballot. I actually read EVERYTHING that is sent to me unlike others who find it easier to blindly trust. Perhaps I should have said I understood that our Mayor felt strongly about this issue and that is why she felt a letter was necessary. In the end, I still stand by my opinion that there is absolutely nothing wrong with questioning our government and following the proper channels when something doesn't sit right with us. As of now, we know that the Mayor may have possibly violated an ethics law. If Randy had received a letter saying the matter wasn't an issue then he would have learned something. Our government officials are there to answer our questions and to serve us, plain and simple. It should never be an insult to question their motives.

Comment_arrow

The Watcher

7:31 pm on Friday, July 13, 2012

Good evening Tammy, perhaps I should not have put your name first on my reply. I was not insinuating you did not know that an explanation was sent out, rather I was explaining that the personal letter was not needed unless it was sent out for other reasons. One of the major drawbacks with this administration appears to be that when they are questioned they act as though no one has the right to question what they do. You summed it up when you said, "Our government officials are there to answer our questions and to serve us, plain and simple. It should never be an insult to question their motives". I think they sometimes forget that we are the taxpayers.

I love Hopatcong

12:01 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

And the cost again? A more efficient and cost effective board? Maybe we can put Randy in charge of all the town's communications. You seem to believe all of his self centered rhetoric. Make sure you put Miss Scarlett in charge of bright ideas while you're at it. There seems to be no bounds to her vindictiveness. They make a cute couple. I'll stick with Sylvia Petillo.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Michele Guttenberger

1:39 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

If your answer is always "Yes" than Sylvia Petillo is a good choice to go with. She'll definitely take care of you with at least a piece of cake.

The Watcher

12:14 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

I was told $25,000.00 (more than the separate boards) budgeted for the "new and improved" mayor and council's version. The state seems to believe Randy's "self centered rhetoric." ILH when you can't base your argument in fact you revert to name calling and accusations, guess you should stick with the mayor and council.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rockon

1:21 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

Watcher The State's decision is not final maybe you and RBOT should wait until it is final before you start beating your chest. The vast majority of people in town support her.

Comment_arrow

Lurky Loo

10:09 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

The vast majority of people don't know she's ethically challenged either. NOW they do, or at least they will soon enough. This kinda news travels faster than light!

Comment_arrow

Rockon

2:07 pm on Friday, July 13, 2012

How about the news that she is not guilty? How fast do you think that will travel?

Roll Back Our Tax

6:40 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

Rockon...where was I "beating my chest"?

Reply

The Watcher

6:41 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

Rockon, is there a reason you had to repeat what I've already said? It is a preliminary decision, and I'm not "beating my chest" over anything. I always find it interesting when people (such as yourself) are quick to respond for the "vast majority of people in town," so you're saying the "vast majority" would support an unethical /misuse of public funds?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Rockon

1:56 pm on Friday, July 13, 2012

Watcher Like you said the final decision is yet to come. and until it does theer is no unethical use of public funds as you would have everyone believe. The vast majority of people in town are smarter then you give them credit for.

Comment_arrow

The Watcher

6:13 pm on Friday, July 13, 2012

Have to disagree with you Rockon, although I said a final decision will be made if and when the mayor appeals, A decision HAS BEEN MADE she violated the law. I noticed you are once again attempting to speak for the vast majority of people in town, and you are now attempting to speak for me. I think the people in the borough will make up their own minds and I am not here to judge their intelligence, nor to speak for them, (unlike you). I believe that they will notice (as I did) that you and "I love Hopatcong" wrote the exact same words in defense of the mayor. Coincidence? I think not !

Roll Back Our Tax

6:54 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

The problem in this country, state and local governments is we have an epidemic where "we're addicted to debt".

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/27-things-that-every-american-should-know-about-the-national-debt

"$15,876,457,645,132.66 from future generations of Americans, and we continue to add well over a hundred million dollars to that total every single day day.  The 15 trillion dollar binge that we have been on over the past 30 years has fueled the greatest standard of living the world has ever seen, but this wonderful prosperity that we have been enjoying has been a lie.  It isn't real.  We have been living way above our means for so long that we do not have any idea of what "normal" actually is anymore.  But every debt addict hits "the wall" eventually, and the same thing is going to happen to us as a nation.  At some point the weight of our national debt is going to cause our financial system to implode, and every American will feel the pain of that collapse.  Under our current system, there is no mathematical way that this debt can ever be paid back.  The road that we are on will either lead to default or to hyperinflation".

I did something about the way our money is spent on a "small scale". But we are living beyond our means here in Hopatcong but the Mayor and Council continue to hand out raises and cut services while still passing on 5-6% tax increases. Whatever we can't meet with our tax revenue gets floated with a new bond issue.

Reply

sherwood stevens

7:27 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

I think the whole deal stinks! The people should stand up and clean out the whole adminstration! There is so much waste in this town and we do not get enough service for our tax dollars!

Reply

Alan J

7:43 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

Cant wait till 3.5 years, I.m going to run for mayor, get her out !!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

BeachBum

8:31 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

Will you promise to lower my sewer bill to a reasonable rate like Rockaway $199.00 annually?

Roll Back Our Tax

7:57 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

Alan J...."We don't have 3.5 years". Have you been watching the news lately?

http://mobile.businessweek.com/news/2012-07-12/california-s-municipal-bankruptcies-sign-of-stigma-waning

We here in Hopatcong show all the signs of an impending bankruptcy. Failed sewer project, uncontrolled spending, more raises, more promotions, etc. All leading to higher property taxes and having to pay higher bond yeilds to finance new debt. What do we get for our money? Cuts in services.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jazzman

1:11 pm on Friday, July 13, 2012

And the Hall....highering another friend in this family circle/circus to replace someone retiring....its just the way they higher down there with all there hinden postings and the those jobs taken before the post is even on the board....curruption at its best,..and after the loss of a long time worker Mrs Moretti,everyone remembers her,she must have worked there into her 70`s and with all her yrs of dedication to this town...not a bit of reconition from anyone from the town,my conclusion,the Patch is OFF limits to anyone working at the boro!they stink like the sewers smell,if people only new why these sewers got off the ground there would be some heart attacks

Michael Flippin

8:52 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

Wow, $2,300 spent on a mailer to try and inform residents of the benefits of a referendum. We are almost as bad as Hudson County. Impeach everyone!!!!!!! I am sure the town now wastes $50,000 dealing with the DCA on this matter. But hey, we got something on the evil doers. Just in case people don't get it. Sarcasm intended.

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

8:56 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

You're right Tammy...."Our government officials are there to answer our questions and to serve us, plain and simple. It should never be an insult to question their motives.". But there seems to be a lot of "self serving" politicians in this borough and their motives are suspect at best. If we can't get the answers at Council meetings, continue to have closed door sessions or have to file OPRA requests at $75 a pop for a CD....then we know they're hiding something. I think I agree with the Watcher. Maybe the only way to the truth is an investigation by the Attorney General's office. Be careful what we wish for....it may happen.

Reply

Christine Genarrio

9:59 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

Whether you agree with RBOT or not this is what it means to live in a democracy. You have the right to not like the fact that the letter was sent just as much as RBOT had the right to send it. We are all free to use that right and whether we choose to or not is another matter. I don't understand why when we are faced with the opportunity to have a healthy debate on here, it turns into an ugly argument. This is why nothing gets done in our town.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gina Buongiorno

11:38 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

Christine, you nailed it. Opposing opinions are what keep things in check but when it gets personal people shut down, become unwilling to listen to others, and fully commit to the defense of their statement/opinion. If you believe strongly in something, the most important thing to do is listen, learn, and understand from those that oppose it.

Chrissy

10:15 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

She should have been voted out last time. After all the money invested in the failed sewers project. After the loss of our towns trash removal and snow removal people. When you see all the beautification going on the borough property in the center of town, but decay on every road that branches off Hopatchung Rd. She SHOULD have been out voted last time. Its very obvious the concern is not for the residents of Hopatcong. It's obvious with our town leaders and our school leaders. They are ALL in it for their own benefit. However, not enough voters, and not enough informed residents, not enough people who care enough to turn things around.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Emily

2:52 pm on Friday, July 13, 2012

Chrissy, Excellent response. Plain and simple and to the point. Want to be the mayor. You definitley have all the issues intact and I really wish we could do something. I have lived hear almost all my life and I am now going" UGH " everytime I ride in and out of town. Not a pretty town. Junk everywhere, absolutley no planning in this town. To be perfetley honest, I am not impressed with the so called beautification at the back of boro hall. Why didn't they have Struble's do the job. Their business is set up great and thank god the nail place fixed their place, then as you move along it goes downhill.Thanks for letting me vent. Have a great week-end

Lurky Loo

10:20 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

Think the Mayor will be around for Hopatcong Days this weekend? I'm thinkin' there might be plenty of people with a few questions for our outstanding, above the board, transparent and ethical Mayor who never has back door meetings closed to the public. :/

Reply
Comment_arrow

jazzman

1:21 pm on Friday, July 13, 2012

Sorry,... she only shows her ass for this so called church with the big billboard with the deep deep pockets...

Comment_arrow

Rockon

8:15 am on Saturday, July 14, 2012

Wil try to speak to her. Will let you know what she has to say.

Comment_arrow

Interesting

10:44 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

Well... If you took a few minutes to step away from your PC this weekend you would certainly know the answer to this question...

Alan J

10:28 am on Friday, July 13, 2012

Yes the sewer issue is totally crazy. I pay the over price bill too. All thar money for what? Sewer prject failed. Where did millions go? Who's pockets? Career politics? I would get rid of all them and start fresh. Also in the schools, teachers crying over raises and pay? Where else can you work, have most of the summer off with pay, and paid vacation, sick days and most, if not all holidays? Do the math, hours works vs. salary. Wish I could have that too! Wake up people and get these usless people out of office!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Observer

5:47 pm on Friday, July 13, 2012

Look, at least get your facts straight! Teachers are paid (not salaries) based on the contracted length of the school year. New Jersey sets the minimum length of the school year (public schools) at 180 days. Contracts in most districts exceed the 180 day minimum. There are NO paid holidays, teachers do not receive Christmas bonuses, and are NOT paid during the summer recess! Don't believe me, prove me wrong! Please, Fox News is not a credible resource.

Comment_arrow

Interesting

10:47 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

Ok... All this talk about the sewers.... Who again was the Mayor that led us into debt to pay for the project.... Yes - I am sure you know, it was the former mayor - take some time to check on that.

james

1:21 pm on Friday, July 13, 2012

If you wish you could have that, then become a teacher....whos really crying here?

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

2:18 pm on Friday, July 13, 2012

Rockon...looks like you joined 7/11. Please complete your profile so we know what you stand for then I'll respond to your questions. Thank you.

Reply

Rich Smith

9:32 pm on Friday, July 13, 2012

As Mayor, not as a candidate, she recommended that people back the referendum. I kind of think she would have an obligation to give her opinion. Personally, I want to know what my Mayor thinks of issues. If she should not have used borough funds, then that is up to the Dept. of Community Affairs. The Mayor needs a source to channel information to the people. Hay, how about a weekly section on the Patch? Call it “The Mayor’s Corner.” or something like that. Considering that the violation caused a $100 fine, it really isn’t such a big deal and considering that the fine was waved because the “violation didn’t personally benefit her.” It’s really a non-issue. But, as we all know, Patchers need something to go after and we will drag this one through the mud for as long as we can.

Reply
Comment_arrow

The Watcher

1:09 am on Saturday, July 14, 2012

Rich if the mayor was trying to inform the people why was the mailing only sent to registered voters? This referendum affected the entire borough and may have even gotten some of the residents to register to vote. The letter also states that her "opinion" is not based in fact. I prefer to have the facts presented to me so I can make my own informed decision. As for "really isn't such a big deal" do you remember when Bunce/Galate/Baker campaign signs violated their own zoning law (NJ Herald)? Do you remember what they did about it? Remember the DPW vote? The over $80,000 dollars of taxpayer money for streetlights/sidewalks. We are now paying $10 for stickers and the mayor decided to give the contractor $8.00 of that. I would like to have been sent a letter explaining why these decisions were made. This is an ethics violation and I for one believe this is an ongoing problem which makes it something to be concerned about.

Comment_arrow

Michele Guttenberger

9:08 am on Saturday, July 14, 2012

Rich - Going on this logic that the message was from a Mayor and not a candidate. The other title Sylvia Petillo has is wife of Ron Petillio of Petillo Enterprises an excavating and sewer/water connection business that services both the private and public sector . This is the title they use when they attend and are sponsors of one of the Hudson Farm Club's charitable events. And Ron Petillo also has another title too as Sussex County Municipal Utilities Authority - SCMUA Chairman. And then the other title Mrs Petillo holds is wife of the Treasurer of an Hopatcong Republican PAC. But of course the title she used for this letter was Mayor of Hopatcong.

Comment_arrow

Rockon

12:53 pm on Saturday, July 14, 2012

michele So what's wrong with her using the title of mayor? It is obvious that you despise her but you really should leave her family out of this unless you have proof of wrong doing. You suggest some plot but you don't have the guts or the substance define it clearly. .

Tammy

11:21 pm on Friday, July 13, 2012

Hi Rich-I agree, the Mayor should let us know her opinion. She should let us know her opinion in open door, public meetings. There was absolutely NO reason for her to use our tax dollars to send out a mailing, an action that is apparently bordering on unethical. She has many forums in which to express her opinions that would cost us nothing. You are right, this is not a major infraction but wouldn't you agree that the more small rules you break the easier it becomes to start breaking the larger ones? As for dragging it through the mud I hope we do. I hope we drag it through the mud until it is exposed for the dirty little secret it is or until us "Patchers" have mud on our face. Once again, I find myself wondering why so many feel it is wrong to question what our government officials are doing. I shudder to think where this country would be if certain government actions weren't questioned. If a politician truly ran for office to serve the people they should expect and welcome people questioning what they are using their position of power for and how their tax dollars are being spent.

Reply

Michele Guttenberger

4:37 pm on Saturday, July 14, 2012

Rockon- You are absolutely right she is the mayor and should use this title. It is her real platform I am uncertain about. As for family I never mentioned them. Both people mentioned hold a public office. One a Mayor and the other the Chairman of SCMUA and the treasurer of a political Republican PAC. Despise is a strong word. I do not trust the actions of the Mayor and question her motives. However, I despise people who have poor ethics. Maybe that's why you think I despise the Mayor.

Reply
Comment_arrow

KristieKreme

6:02 pm on Saturday, July 14, 2012

Michelle- Thank you for your sledge hammer wit. I intend my remark as a complement. As you know, sometimes it takes cranial trauma to make a point. I often wonder if it's worth the effort though. Enjoy the rest of your weekend.

Michele Guttenberger

6:41 pm on Saturday, July 14, 2012

KristeKreme -
I am glad you appreciate my wit. Because, I often appreciate yours on many comment postings. There were times you had me in stitches. It is the jester who could pass criticism on the king/queendom. I see a lot of parallels here. And you can bet Rockon doesn't get a word of what I am saying and that also gives me a big chuckle. So you see, it is never really wasted when some dimwitted response brings comic relief to a serious topic. We should always encourage these people to reply. They are the grist to our witty comments where we too can become the skilled jester.

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

8:37 am on Sunday, July 15, 2012

Looks like we now have borough attorney John Ursin trying to spin this. He couldn't answer my email whether he's representing the Mayor in this matter but he has certainly used his postion publicly to give the Mayor some legal advice. His comment to the NJ Herald should have been "no comment".

http://www.njherald.com/story/19027359/hopatcong-mayors-letter-spurs-complaint?clienttype=printable

Borough Attorney John Ursin pointed out that the action was voted on by the six council members to be placed on the ballot. The mayor never voted on the matter.

"When you say this is ‘taxpayer dollars,' this is all an official function," Ursin said. "I do think mayor's letter accurately conveyed the reasoning of the governing body for placing it on the agenda, and I completely disagree with any concept that the mayor somehow personally benefited from this."

Reply
Comment_arrow

jazzman

10:15 am on Sunday, July 15, 2012

ok its like the old saying "one hand washes the other and both hands wash the face",in time the plan is for it to come around full circle,person benefit is there...it just hasnt come full circle,cronic but thats politics you will agree thats how they do business,Ok its like ohhhhh...we got a new fire truck all we have to is vote in 3yrs! everything that happens down there is a personal benefit to her realection,in chess every move made is to win the game and if we sit back and we will, come next election its check mate!in the mean time the circle just gets bigger and stronger

Comment_arrow

Rockon

4:06 pm on Sunday, July 15, 2012

So can someone please tell me who and how anyone has had personal gain from the decision to merge the boards.

Michele Guttenberger

4:25 pm on Sunday, July 15, 2012

Jazzman - that was a great analogy. Yes, she is playing a chess match and each year she advances her position. Unfortunately, the folks in Hopatcong don't realize this. Everyone thinks the Mayor's only motive is performing her role as Mayor and never asks if she has any personal business associations that can receive an unfair advantage from her policy decisions. They audit their cost accounts with an outside agency but not their policy and contract deals for integrity. Ethics are a hard thing to enforce when you have given up all controls and give your town officials complete authority. It then becomes a costly and time consuming proposition for someone to protest and they may have to use their own personal funds to do it because they don't have the benefit of the best paid defense. A defense that is used against us the taxpayer from our tax revenue. What a democracy we live in. As Randy has stated Ursin has already providing statements to the press on the Mayor's behalf which shows his position on the matter. Let's expel Ursin. His record has shown he does not take positions on behalf of the citizen. He has been the attorney to Hudson Farms and the principals of this entity which are the largest landholders of Hopatcong and where Ursin is involved in processing resolutions on their behalf as our Town attorney. This arrangement seems too close to be called balanced.

Reply

The Watcher

11:04 pm on Sunday, July 15, 2012

Mr. Ursin may have given his opinion but I'm sure the taxpayers paid for it. Problem is the mayor and council are all about re-election. Michelle the article says she spent the money to "print, stamp, stuff, and mail the letter" so who is getting paid to "stuff" the envelopes? Are they friends or relatives? How would we find out?

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

5:55 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

Rockon....still waiting for you to post your profile so we know "what you believe in" because it appears you only started commenting on Patch when this article was written which leads me to believe "you're a person of interest".

Reply
Comment_arrow

The Watcher

9:15 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

Rockon is only posting to do damage control that IS his profile.

Roll Back Our Tax

11:02 am on Monday, July 16, 2012

Interesting....I am glad you're commenting again because every time you comment I get more members in my group. This has to be one of your best.

"Who again was the Mayor that led us into debt to pay for the sewer project"?

That's like Obama saying...."it's not my fault $5 trillion was added to the US debt during my 4 years of Presidency...I wasn't President when the economy went into a recession....George Bush was therefore I am NOT responsible for my spending".

At some point one has to take responsibility and quit kicking the can down the road.

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/kicking-the-can-down-the-road

What will Mayor Petillo say once she has to file bankruptcy for Hopatcong....."NOT MY FAULT"? With all the raises she's handed out like candy, uncontrolled spending on things like mailers, unnecessary upgrades to borough hall, street light fiasco, etc over last 4 years, you think at some point someone has to take responsibility. Right?

Reply

Tammy

12:15 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

Interesting--So our sewer bills haven't increased since Mayor Petillo has been in office? Even with the increases the project still isn't complete and the roads aren't in pre-sewer condition. Well, the roads the Mayor doesn't drive on aren't anyway. By the way, I noticed you didn't comment on the central issue of this thread. I would really love to read your spin on this one.
Randy--Don't hold your breath waiting for Interesting to respond to your responsibility question. I have asked Interesting several times who is responsible for the current state of our town and have never received an answer. When it comes to our Mayor if Interesting can't say anything nice he/she doesn't say anything at all.

Reply

Michele Guttenberger

3:00 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

RBOT - What makes you think the Mayor CARES if the Town goes into bankruptcy since it falls under County Control if it does. She is already making nice with the County Health Dept with her "chucking the HHD out before their term clean up". She was so successful with this she only had one person left from the old Health Dept. Even Rosie from the Bounty ads couldn't mop up that well. The County must love her and I am sure they have a special place for her since she has been so good to the County. Petillo Enterprises has also been generous to the Hudson Farm Club charities. I'm sure if the County doesn't have a place her, the principals of the Club can offer her some good job leads. Hopatcong Bankruptcy NO PROBLEM. Mayor Petillo will always have a good personal credit line. Now you tarnishing her rep with an Ethics Violation that is something she does care about. Hard to be the Prayer in the Park Mayor with an ethics violation rap sheet. Let 's pull out our "SYLVIA'S GOT ETHICS" campaign buttons to show our support.

Reply

jazzman

5:02 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

ITS is amazing though,.. found or borrowed all this money to pay for a sewer project,Then....Im thinking lost money to mostly cost run over to that project!,Gag...and then the roads were paid for under the "where that HELL did that money come from project!...ok im now thinking AUDITTTTTTTT

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lurky Loo

6:17 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

They found the money then lost it because they didn't file the paperwork either properly or in a timely manner and we lost a ton of grant money. Not that there weren't other problems before that, like the first company (Marrabella) sp? who went bankrupt trying to put sewers in a town built on top of ledge rock on top of more rocks or the fact that the town couldn't finish the project so those who have it had to pay more. A mess from beginning to end! Not that I blame the current Mayor for the sewer abomination, but I would like to know which committee she sat on during that time frame and what, if any, did she have to do with it? Did she vote on it as a Town Council member?

Comment_arrow

KristieKreme

7:39 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

Loo- I believe that the mayor at the time of the sewer project approval was a physics professor at a northern NJ State University. While that's not the same as a geology professor, you would think that anyone familiar with the topography would understand what a monumental task a sewer system would be.

jazzman

7:28 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

when they took on this project it was a town vote and thats because it was a town project,then why didnt they tax any RUN OVERS to ALL the tax payers of Hop ...we now are paying for something we didnt vote or agree to and if they would have completed what they started the bill would be lower or maybe out of sight?hell the whole project was fraud...needed the sewers to build houses on properties in town where they could never ever had built on....geee who might that be....?

Reply
Comment_arrow

The Watcher

7:46 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

It becomes a bigger problem when you spend money you don't have so things keep getting re financed. Don't think the bill will ever decrease.

Rich Smith

8:22 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

A few years after I came to town that project was put to the voters and was solidly put down at the polls. So much for rule by referendum. Then, all of a sudden this big bunch of money was produced and we had to rush into the project before the money was taken away. Not only did they not get all the residents in the town (Oddly enough, the reason for the grants was to “save the lake” and some of the places without sewers are nearest to the lake like Elba.) but the money went away before the septic systems and the people who got hooked up sound as if the REALLY got hooked up. Either the town should have been hooked up 40 years ago before Rt80 came through or it should have been zoned better. We have clusters of homes that never should be built for year round use. Nothing to be done about either of those now but it has left the town in a bad spot. That’s about all I can say about this busted sewer project which, if memory serves me, was under a different administration. At the time I was hoping to get hooked up, now, I think it was better to be among the missed.

Reply

Tammy

10:22 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

You are better to be among the missed Mr. Smith. You are right, it was under a different administration but the current administration has raised the fee (more than once if memory serves) and still hasn't finished the project nor fixed the roads. Why are the fees continually rising? I feel sorry for our older residents who are on a fixed income and have been assets to our town for decades and are being forced out of their homes because they can't afford the ever increasing taxes and sewer fees.

Reply

The Watcher

10:58 pm on Monday, July 16, 2012

We barely (if at all) have the money to pay the interest charges

Reply
Comment_arrow

Roll Back Our Tax

10:24 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012

You're right Watcher and it's not going to get any better in the years to come. Just on the sewer utility bonds alone that we have to pay in 2012 the principal is $686,292 while the interest is $1,040,183. For 2016 - 2020 it's projected to be $6,633,060 in principal and $5,350,403 in interest. Where do you think sewer rates will be at then?

John Pezzino

8:34 am on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

I know I'm going to make a few democrats angry with what I'm about to say, (it’s not my intension) but I'm compelled to comment.

I don't believe for a minute that Mayor Petillo made a conscience decision to break the rules, I believe the mayors heart is in the right place, and she is really trying to do the right thing, BUT as the old saying goes its hard to soar like an eagle when your surrounded by turkeys.

Galanti and Bunce, they want us to believe they’re team players, and experts in all things government, but why didn’t they stop this mailing? Did they want the mayor to fail? Or did they just not know the law? Too me that's even worst. For the record, I don’t approve of how they did this or the restructuring to create this new land use board, so with that being said, I feel sad for the mayor that they left her to take the heat alone, when we all know this was a group effort.

Mayor Petillo, if I’m elected, I will bring to the table the view of the blue collar worker, I can put partisan politics aside to move Hopatcong forward for the betterment of all our citizens, but be forewarned I’m not a yes man, I take the publics trust very serious. I for one will be praying for a positive result in this matter, when this is behind us the next great thing I could hope for is that the people of Hopatcong allow me the privilege to serve them on the council. Good luck mayor and god bless.

John Pezzino Democratic Council Candidate

Reply
Comment_arrow

Roll Back Our Tax

2:45 pm on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

John....what my group RBOT is hoping for is "restitution" for the taxpayer's money and then "resignations" once an investigation is done by the Attorney General's office.

Comment_arrow

Michele Guttenberger

3:02 pm on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Mr Democratic Candidate, your heartfelt words for the Mayor were so sweet - a diabetic could be in trouble just reading it. I was hoping that a candidate from an opposing party would be the watchdog for the people as a council member and push for balance and transparency from our Mayor. Instead it looks like you want to join her fan club. In order for you to be the watchdog for the people, you got to know whom you are watching. This comment clearly shows that you don't know who is on first and what is on second in Mayor/Council politics. But with these kind words I'm sure the Mayor will invite you to her ball game. There will be plenty of popcorn for those that don't really want to watch the ball.

Comment_arrow

Michele Guttenberger

6:49 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

DINO Pezzino heard you went to the Mayor's Ball Game and chocked on the popcorn.

Tammy

1:08 pm on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Mr. Pezzino-As a registered Democrat I must say you didn't anger me a bit. I must draw your attention the the fact that you forewarned the Mayor you are not a yes man. That would imply that our Mayor is now surrounded by yes men/women. If they are constantly saying yes to her than how is it not the Mayor's fault that she is not soaring like an eagle? If they are giving her exactly what she is asking for and the end result is not successful the blame must fall to her.
You also believe she is trying to do the right thing. The question is the right thing for who? It certainly isn't for the people of Hopatcong. I look back and think if she had just listened to what the taxpayers wanted and the town was in the shape it's in she would be able to say "this is what you wanted folks". Instead, she has turned a deaf ear to our concerns and our requests so where the town of Hopatcong is and how a great many residents feel towards her sits squarely on her.

Reply

The Watcher

1:08 pm on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Sounds like you should have switched parties and run in the primary.

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

4:23 pm on Wednesday, July 18, 2012

Lurky Loo...a little bio on the Mayor

http://www.lakehopatcongnews.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=969:freshwater-face-hopatcong-mayor-sylvia-petillo&catid=93:freshwater-faces&Itemid=552

She attended Newark schools, then received her bachelor's degree in music education from William Paterson University & her master's in education from Marywood University in Scranton, Pa. Petillo started out as a music teacher & then moved into the classroom as an elementary teacher. She taught in Newark, Garfield, Montclair & Andover. Then, she got married, raised her two children & worked for her husband's business -- a site development company in Kenvil.

So, how did Petillo get involved in public service? Petillo started a group called TRACS, an acronym for To Raise a Child Safely. Then, she started the Hopatcong Helping Hands program, which allowed residents to register with police to identify homes as safe spots with a sticker. She started that around the first time she ran for school board in 1995 -- she served for nine years, holding the position of vice president for two years and president as four. Next Petillo ran for mayor, but she lost the first time. She was elected to the Borough Council (one, three-year term), and then she ran for mayor again, and won. She ran for re-election again in 2012 and faced no opposition.

So to answer your questions "was she on Council when the sewer system was approved"? possibly if it was during 2005 - 07.

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

9:42 am on Friday, August 10, 2012

Not only is the mailing of the announcement of "voting for" the combining of the two boards unethical but the legal representation by Attorney Ursin for both the Hopatcong borough and Hudson Farms could be construed as a "conflict of interest". Even though he didn't actually vote on any matters concerning the borough he was there as a "legal consultant" for the Mayor to advise. There is a documented case in Mendham which implies a conflict of interest "even though he (an architect who was a member of the zoning board) did not discuss or vote on the matter".

http://www.njslom.org/magart_1207_pg18.html

"In one unreported Law Division case, the court held that the adoption of a zoning ordinance was invalid because the council president, who had a conflict, presided over the proceedings, even though he did not discuss or vote on the matter. (Beacon Hill Farm,LLC. v. Marlboro, unreported 2006, 2006 WL 1161361). Furthermore, in a recent unreported Appellate Division case, Newmark v. Mendham (A-4857-05T1, 2007), the court held that recusal and absence from deliberations was still not enough to avoid the taint of conflict where the nonparticipating board member was the architect who prepared the plans for the subdivision and variance application submitted'.

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

9:43 am on Friday, August 10, 2012

continued....

http://www.meislik.com/cases/newmark_v_mendham_bd_adj/

"The approved application included a plan drafted by an architect who was a current member of that zoning board. In the neighbor’s suit, it was alleged that the zoning board’s decision was arbitrary, capricious, and unreasonable, and that submission of the plans prepared by the architect who was a member of the zoning board constituted a conflict of interest"

The Court affirmed the lower court’s finding of a conflict of interest, agreeing that a mere recusal by the architect from judging the application in which he submitted an expert report does not remove an appearance of impropriety.

Reply

Michele Guttenberger

10:35 am on Friday, August 10, 2012

Roll Back thanks for the advice on the NJ League of Municipalities on what is a Conflict of Interest with the NJSLOM. How does a Citizen get the NSLOM to investigate these ethics issues. The court cases you stated seem to be very relative to our current issue with our Borough Attorney. I feel that there has been resolutions voted by our council that did not provide updated information about Hudson Farms for one - they never refer to Hudson Farms by their legal name when approving a Borough resolution - that being MMK Reinsurance Bermuda Ltd. I think the citizen should know the legal party name on Borough Resolutions. Also - these resolutions also state the former use of the property of Hudson Farms and not its current use. They have a Commercial Shooting License and have a private shooting club on this property. This information was omitted on the resolution information up for council vote. One of these resolutions was for sewer hook up for previous existing cottages on Hudson Farms when it was a camp. Should not they have disclosed whether these connections infringe on the shooting range free buffer zone of human habitat structures. I often leave this Town Meetings with many questions afterwards of what was really passed and voted on. I have to find information from other sources because it is not being supplied by our Borough officials. Omission of key info should be an ethics violation too.

Reply

The Watcher

11:38 am on Friday, August 10, 2012

Michelle isn't Galate the president of the NJ League of Municipalities?

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

2:58 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

Of course she is Watcher....we all know that.

http://hopatcong.patch.com/articles/quick-bio-council-candidate-marie-galate

Elected and Appointed Positions: Previously elected to Hopatcong Borough Council 1997-1999; currently serving as a Hopatcong Borough councilwoman since 2007; current President of Sussex County League of Municipalities and past president of Sussex County League of Municipalities 2011; Past Vice President Sussex County League of Municipalities 2010; Former Council President Hopatcong Borough Council 2009; Original Founding Member Hopatcong Business Association; Former Secretary, Vice President and President Hopatcong Business League; Former Secretary, Vice President and President Hopatcong Republican Club; Council Liaison to Police, Fire, Emergency service, Ambulance squad, Senior citizen, Energy audit Committee, Real Estate, Board of Health (alternate)

Reply

Michele Guttenberger

3:23 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

We should ask Ms Galate at the next Town Meeting why she did not fulfill her obligations as President of Sussex County League of Municipalities on Ethic issues especially a Conflict of Interest with Ursin representing Hudson Farms and the Borough. She failed to follow her responsibilities as League President of Sussex County since that is one of the tenets of this position maintaining that a Code of Ethics is enforced among town officials. Maybe she should step down from this position. People should realize that it is more than a free luncheon when you accept to become an officer to an organization. There is a pledge to enforce the mission statement of that organization. Isn't she taking classes on this stuff and haven't we been paying her tuition fees on this? Another example of our tax dollars being wasted on local politicos.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Roll Back Our Tax

3:58 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

Michele....maybe they'll use her as a "scape goat".

The Watcher

3:26 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

President Hopatcong Business League; Former Secretary, why don't we have more business in town?

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

3:31 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

I wish I could answer that Watcher. All I can say is "ignorance is bliss".

Reply

Michele Guttenberger

8:50 pm on Friday, August 10, 2012

Who would of thought Galate. All our bets were that the Mayor was going to take down Bunce since she invited Democrat DINO Pezzino to the ball game. But I guess the Mayor has her term secured and so it is a jack rat race for council no party loyalty from Petillo's Republican PAC. Who ever can say YES without blinking wins.

Reply
Comment_arrow

The Watcher

11:26 am on Sunday, August 12, 2012

Interesting observations Michelle!

Michele Guttenberger

12:34 pm on Sunday, August 12, 2012

Watcher - Interesting? Not really, just a display of the true Moral character of our Mayor. That behind the back of her Republican Council incumbent running mates she is inviting a Democratic contender to the Ball Game. Is she hedging her bets? Maybe she is concerned that Mara Modes might get in. I'm sure this would be devastating to the Mayor if she does. Mara is one of the people who fact checks everything and is always at city hall making OPRA requests. I'm sure if elected she would be cleaning out the closets and finding all those old skeleton issues that have been hidden away but still causing the "black mold" of our town. That would really cause chaos in our town. I had the pleasure of knowing her political views when I did my one day protest write-in campaign for Mayor when we had an uncontested race. Although Mara may not have the sweet charm and Church Lady following as our Mayor, she is a concerned citizen with very high ethics. I found out that she volunteers at a hospital rape center. I guess some people just don't boast about the volunteer work they do for their community. I told her because she doesn't brag she will never be a successful politician and she should just hang it up. "No one is going to vote for you." Of course she is not listening to my advice and so she is going in for the additional abuse by the fair mouthed people of Hopatcong and is running again for council under the Democratic ticket.

Reply

The Watcher

9:59 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012

Looks like you were right Michelle John's not a smart person "DINO Pezzino heard you went to the Mayor's Ball Game and chocked on the popcorn."

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

9:12 am on Tuesday, August 21, 2012

According to Wikipedia, Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) affects one percent of the population and has little to do with looking at themselves in the mirror. It has a lot to do with unrealistic fantasies of success, power and intelligence. Some NPD sufferers become cult leaders or mass murderers, the rest become economists and policy-makers. Despite having a highly elevated sense of self-worth, narcissists have fragile self-esteem and handle criticism unpredictably, so let’s keep this to ourselves because John Pezinno and the Mayor belong together.

http://hopatcong.patch.com/articles/democratic-write-in-candidate-defends-mayor-on-ethics-charges

In the meantime, let's check out John Pezzino's Facebook site.

http://www.facebook.com/joggercong

He's really into "girlie" magazines.

http://www.facebook.com/pages/IFBB-Bikini-Pro-Juliana-Daniell/133845530017308

http://www.facebook.com/FemFitnessModels

http://www.facebook.com/HotChicksWithAbs

http://www.facebook.com/pages/IFBB-Bikini-Inge-D-C-Moeller/252247018148393

So he wants to align himself with the Republican party in this borough? Yes that's where he belongs. Keep him! Send us a thank you letter.

Reply
Comment_arrow

The Watcher

1:14 am on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Thanks Randy sounds like your opinion of DINO (John) Pezzino aka real bad on truth fits like a glove.

Roll Back Our Tax

5:09 am on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Watcher...well anyone that has pictures of women with big breasts on their Facebook site and then claims to be an admirer of body builders is suspicious to me.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1206927904061&set=a.1161339644383.25646.1554595270&type=1&theater

John thinks he's the only cross bearer in this world. We all have stories of great challenges in life that we overcame. I for one grew up in a family with a brother who from birth was mentally retarded or shall I say "challenged". When my mother died at the age of 52, I who was 13 at the time and my sister 18 took care of my brother till he died at the age of 55. I can't begin to tell you the abuse I put up with in grade school about having a mentally challenged brother. But John calls himself a Christian yet he can't put down his sword because he's part of the Crusade to name call, add pictures on Patch using my handle, etc....all to discredit me. Anyone that needs to start a bogus site like RBOT RealBadOnTruth aka John Pezzino is under the narcissistic illusion "they're somebody" but in reality they hide BEHIND THE TRUTH and are a failure in my eyes. Now I am off to work. Need to pay my taxes. Sleep well John for the rest of the day.

Reply

Michele Guttenberger

8:24 am on Thursday, August 23, 2012

Oh what a tangled web we weave when we practice to deceive.

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

12:53 pm on Friday, August 24, 2012

Hey Rock On...."And where do we go from here? Which is the way that's clear?"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-q_cq-qdYLI

Please do tell us Mayor Petillo. Where do we go from here?

As the Walls Come Tumbling Down....as the Walls Come Tumbling Down.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PErUiAyVoGc

Take the plea bargain deal. You don't want an investigation.

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

11:30 am on Friday, August 31, 2012

So yesterday I had to explain myself to the Hopatcong Police Department regarding an investigation they were conducting on behalf of Mayor Petillo regarding a comment I made in a post using the words "anger" and "danger" in same paragraph. She found it "threatening". I have forwarded those series of emails onto the Ethics Committee and Attorney General's office for review. I believe she used her position once again for her "personal gain". Desperation breeds contempt and the Mayor is thinks she is one step ahead of me. In realty hope breeds despair and she will grasp at anything to discredit me.

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

6:16 am on Monday, September 3, 2012

Yes toilets and garbage disposals....sanitizing the world and Hopatcong borough hall. I'll hang an air freshner up there before I leave.

Reply
Comment_arrow

jazzman

7:44 am on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Randy i think you need to be a team player to start,get into the circle,join the business asso. for protection....eat some hot dogs at the park,and maybeeeee get in on that parade stuff they have down there twice a year...did we even have a parade this labor day.... those parade watchers more like the lambs to the slaughter and votes to the queen

Comment_arrow

The Watcher

12:21 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

Jazzman, nice to know someone else is "watching." Pretty impressive but in your advice I think you left out the heavenly events at the park. Randy, did you ever find out if the mayor appealed the ethics violation?

The Watcher

6:16 am on Monday, September 3, 2012

Randy you're not the first and I'm sure you will not be the last

Reply

Roll Back Our Tax

9:08 am on Thursday, September 6, 2012

I just got off the phone with the Ethics Board. They advised me that the Mayor's hearing will be held October 10th in Trenton. The agenda will be posted here on October 4th or 5th.

http://www.nj.gov/dca/divisions/dlgs/programs/lfb.html

It's an open public meeting. Anyone is welcome to attend. But it will not be open to public comment.

Department of Community Affairs
Conference Room #129/235A
101 South Broad Street
Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0803

Reply

Michele Guttenberger

2:41 pm on Tuesday, September 4, 2012

jazzman – There is mindset that lives on with some of the crony controlled clubs and orgs that march in these parades. I agree Randy must join an organization that believes in the people of their community and does great things without political reward. A group to hang out with and have a hot dog. They do exist in Hopatcong. There are grassroots groups like parents who are involved in their kids fund raising campaigns for school projects that are not being funded. I was forced out of our town’s crony rule clubs and committees for having different political views from the current political regime. So my solution was to join a national women's organization that supports and encourages STEM educational and anti bullying programs at local schools. That was a back door approach to serving my community that removes me from the local political fray. Now my advice is to join an org or club in town where the Mayor is not a member. These are clubs that really want to do something to make Hopatcong a better place to live. Once your club or organization becomes influenced by local government leaders who are also members, it is transformed to a political stumping camp for cronyism and it becomes difficult to lunch new programs and projects without partisan controls . This my own personal ethics issue I have with the Mayor.

Reply

Leave a comment